STATEMENTS

Comment protesting against an undesirable amendment to the medical insurance system giving priority to heavier burden

20 December, 2001

Tadayoshi KUSANO
General Secretary, RENGO

  1. On 11 February, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda, Health, Labour and Welfare Minister Chikara Sakaguchi, and governing parties' Secretaries-General and the Policy Affairs Research Council heads agreed on the revision bill to Health Insurance Law and others that would be submitted to the current Diet session, which includes a raise in patient burden to 30% from April 2003.

    A promise that drastic reform of medical systems, such as the medical treatment fee system and the aged person medical system, is performed by the fiscal year 2000 was thrown into a wastebasket. Furthermore, the agreement to increase patients' burden means to give up the responsibility for medical system reform. The bill is absolutely unacceptable.

  2. This agreement proposes: 1) raising patients' burden from 20% to 30%, 2) abolishing partial burden of charges for medicine and 3) raising a premium rate of the public health insurance from 7.5% to 8.2% on the basis of "total remuneration system". Although the timetable of the implementation of a raise in patients' burden is clear, areas to be reformed are limited and neither concrete contents nor deadline is indicated. The government promised at the Diet session in 1997 the implementation of the drastic reform within the fiscal year 2000 and it was also specified in a supplementary provision of National Health Insurance Law as revised in 1998 that the reform be implemented in the fiscal year 2000. The government broke its promise and even the law. The government was again postponing the reform.

  3. As regards the revision bill of Health Insurance Law and others, which are planned to be submitted to the current Diet session, there was no agreement between the government, who insists April 2003 as a date when raising patients' burden to 30%, and Liberal Democratic Party, who insists that the date be determined taking into consideration economic and employment situation. Both side compromised with wording "when necessary" at the end of the year 2001. This agreement is that the Secretaries-General of the governing parties accepted Prime Minister Koizumi's opinion that raising patients' burden to 30% advances reform of a medical system. However, 30% of patients' burden is exceptionally high among industrialized countries. Moreover, there is no guarantee that such raise will advance reform. Contents of the agreement essentially impute the burden to employees from who it would be the easiest to take.

  4. Working people are heartily asking for the establishment of reliable medical services where patients and doctors trust each other. Rengo is reflecting this voice in the reform of medical system. In doing so, Rengo would collect one million signatures in February and March and present them to the Diet. With the one million signature-collecting campaign, Rengo would drive the undesirable revision bill into a scrapped bill.

HOME
Statments