The Dispatched Labor Law/Employment Security Law
"Registered Dispatchment is not Enough"
Statement on "Looking Ahead For Progress" Passing the Lower House
(21 May 1999)

Photo: 500 people chanted "Heed RENGO's demands" before the Diet, May 19.

photoAfter pushing its 7-point demands for the Dispatched Labor Law Amendment, RENGO held an emergency rally on the evening of May 19 when the labor committee in the House of Representatives passed the five-party unification bill regarding the revision of the Dispatched Labor Law and the Employment Security Law. Further, RENGO ratified its judgement on the amendment by the three opposition parties and decided on its strategy for the amendment at the 24th Central Executive Committee held the following day on May 20.

 RENGO's Judgement of the Unified Amendment by the Three Oppositional Parties (which eventually became the Five-Party Joint Amendment) and its Future Strategies

The unitary demands that the three opposition parties agreed to, consist of most of the worker protection measures pursued by RENGO. However, the measures to "prohibit registered dispatchment" on newly planned temporary dispatched labor, which RENGO had placed such great importance on, were not adopted. This matter is highly regrettable and entirely unsatisfactory.

The following are the opposition parties' unitary demands for worker protection measures:

  1. Prevention against the substitution of conventional employment.
  2. Protection of the privacy of dispatched workers.
  3. Establish client responsibility for a) equal opportunity and b) sexual harassment in the workplace.
  4. Protection against the unilateral cancellation of dispatched laborer's contracts.
  5. Promotion of the adoption of social/labor insurance coverage for dispatched workers.

When liberalizing dispatchment services, RENGO concluded that it is critically important to add penalties to guarantee the effectiveness of the above measures considering that current employment and working conditions of dispatched workers who have been categorized into special fields.

RENGO studied the amendment based on the unitary demands that the three opposition parties agreed upon, and RENGO assesses that from the view of RENGO conclusion, the issues regarding protection of workers are nearly solved in the amendment. However, RENGO judged that the employment instability that registered dispatched workers must bear is still insufficient from this settlement.

On May 19, the Labor Committee in the House of Representatives passed the amendment with a slight revision as a political decision through their responsibility as a political party. The bill will be immediately sent to the House of Chancellors via the plenary session at the House of Representatives on May 21st.
On May 19, after the bill passed in committee, RENGO held a rally in front of the Diet, invited representatives from the three opposition parties and the Liberal Party, and reported on its progress and endorsed continuing action on this issue. RENGO determined to continue working at succeeding deliberations in the Upper House focusing on the matter of employment instability.

(The Outline, endorsed at the 24th Central Executive Committee.)

1999 Spring Struggle
Wage Hike Settlement Summary

Total: Private Sector as of May 12, 1999

[Individual Wage Increases, Method A (actual increase)]
+ Actual wage increase

Referent Unions

Average per union (simple average)

Wage standard before revision
1999 Demand 1999 Settlement 1998 Result
No. of unions No. of workers wage standard Wage increase+ Wage standard Wage increase+ Wage standard Wage increase+
35 yrs old 79 726,394 ¥318,539 ¥321,898 ¥3,454 ¥319,435 ¥897(0.28%) ¥315,379 ¥1,964
30 yrs old 45 87,074 ¥277,791 ¥280,845 ¥3,124 ¥278,812 ¥1,021(0.37%) ¥271,454 ¥1,695

[Individual Wage Increase, Method B (including regular increase)]
*Including regular increase

Referent Unions Average per union (simple average)

Wage standard previous year
1999 Demand 1999 Settlement 1998 Result
No. of unions No. of workers Wage standard Wage* increase Wage standard Wage* increase Wage standard Wage* increase
35 yrs old 125 229,300 ¥297,339 ¥308,777 ¥11,139 ¥305,227 ¥7,888(2.65%) ¥299,984 ¥8,602
30 yrs old 123 454,994 ¥263,439 ¥274,047 ¥10,118 ¥270,863 ¥7,423(2.82%) ¥267,060 ¥8,476

1999 Spring Struggle Answers
[Average Wage Increase]

Demanding Unions Average per union worker (weighted average) Average per union (simple average)
No. of unions No. of workers

Age

Years of service Average wage 1999 Demand 1999 Settlement 1998 Result Age Years of service Average wage 1999 Demand 1999 Settlement 1998 Result
834 1,804,667 38.5 17.2 ¥309,798 ¥9,279 ¥6,542(2.11%) ¥7,999 37.5 15.2 ¥278,201 ¥9,049 ¥5,462(1.96%) ¥6,954



HOME
Current Domestic
Actions